Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Female Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Immigrants from Southern Europe
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,146,424 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 402,507,069 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 0.20%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
Minimum | 3.6% | 6.6% |
Maximum | 26.7% | 37.8% |
Range | 23.1% | 31.3% |
Mean | 13.0% | 14.1% |
Median | 13.0% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Southern Europe by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Welsh (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |