Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,645,999 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,784,385 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.95%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.23% |
| Maximum | 29.4% | 23.3% |
| Range | 27.9% | 23.1% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 11.0% |
| Median | 9.8% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |