Pima vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Pima
Zimbabwean
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Pima
Zimbabweans
28.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
21.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,293,742 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,868,173 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 39.1%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 8.0% | 0.87% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.9% |
| Range | 92.0% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 41.5% | 17.3% |
| Median | 34.9% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.5% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 37.0% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.5% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.9% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Pima by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Sioux (28.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Hopi (28.2%, a difference of 0.72%), Cheyenne (28.1%, a difference of 0.94%), Colville (29.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and Kiowa (29.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 28.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.2% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.8% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.1% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Spain (20.4%, a difference of 0.020%), German (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), European (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Czech (20.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Latvia (20.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 29.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 20.3% |
| Moroccans | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 20.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 24.4 /100 | #192 | Fair 20.4% |
| Nigerians | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 20.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 23.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 20.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 23.0 /100 | #195 | Fair 20.4% |
| Czechs | 22.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 20.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 21.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 20.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 20.7 /100 | #198 | Fair 20.4% |
| Germans | 20.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 20.4% |
| Europeans | 19.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 20.4% |
| Mexicans | 18.3 /100 | #201 | Poor 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 17.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 17.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 20.5% |