Pima vs British Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Pima
British
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Pima
British
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs British Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 514,706,514 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 88.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | British |
| Minimum | 11.0% | 6.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 89.0% | 93.9% |
| Mean | 41.2% | 30.8% |
| Median | 34.9% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.2% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 57.9% | 36.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.7% | 22.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.6% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.1% | 25.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |
Demographics Similar to British by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (15.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (15.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |