Pima vs Menominee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Pima
Menominee
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Pima
Menominee
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Menominee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,532,886 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 25.0%, a difference of 12.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Menominee |
Minimum | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 87.5% |
Range | 89.0% | 78.5% |
Mean | 41.2% | 29.7% |
Median | 34.9% | 24.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.2% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 57.9% | 38.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.7% | 20.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.6% | 18.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.1% | 18.1% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Menominee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 0.70%), Black/African American (24.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Sioux (25.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and Native/Alaskan (24.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |