Jordanian vs British Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jordanian
British
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jordanians
British
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs British Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,455,872 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 514,706,514 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | British |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 6.1% |
| Maximum | 38.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 36.5% | 93.9% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 30.8% |
| Median | 13.2% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 36.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 22.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 25.2% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and British by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (15.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (15.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |