Osage vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Osage
Chickasaw
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Osage
Chickasaw
10.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,738,708 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,403,073 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.3%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.89% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 22.5% | 26.4% |
| Range | 21.6% | 24.4% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 11.9% |
| Median | 9.3% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Chickasaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (10.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Ethiopian (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Fijian (10.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 84.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 10.5% |
| Osage | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 80.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Iraqis | 80.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Laotians | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 10.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 79.0 /100 | #147 | Good 10.6% |
| Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 77.3 /100 | #150 | Good 10.6% |
| Spanish | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 10.6% |
| Fijians | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 74.9 /100 | #154 | Good 10.7% |
| Chickasaw | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 10.7% |
| Ethiopians | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.9 /100 | #157 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 71.7 /100 | #158 | Good 10.7% |