Osage vs Chickasaw Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,730,498 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.231 and weighted average of $55,677. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,447,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of $53,732, a difference of 3.6%.

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago ($55,598, a difference of 0.14%), American ($55,527, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Portugal ($55,924, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Bangladesh ($55,394, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina ($55,986, a difference of 0.55%).

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois ($53,737, a difference of 0.010%), African ($53,711, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados ($53,766, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute ($53,762, a difference of 0.060%), and Shoshone ($53,681, a difference of 0.090%).