Osage vs Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Osage
Czechoslovakian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Osage
Czechoslovakians
10.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,738,708 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,521,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 11.6%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 0.89% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 22.5% | 44.2% |
Range | 21.6% | 43.1% |
Mean | 9.9% | 11.8% |
Median | 9.3% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 8.1% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Osage by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (10.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 86.4 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 85.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 10.5% |
Portuguese | 84.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 83.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Europe | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 10.5% |
Osage | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Asia | 80.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.6% |
Iraqis | 80.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.6% |
Laotians | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 10.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 79.0 /100 | #147 | Good 10.6% |
Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Latvian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.43%), Scotch-Irish (9.5%, a difference of 0.50%), Belgian (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Belgians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |