New Zealander vs British Family Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
British
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
British
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs British Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,830,262 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,449,567 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | British |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 19.9% | 61.1% |
Range | 18.8% | 58.4% |
Mean | 7.4% | 14.8% |
Median | 6.4% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 15.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and British by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Slovak (7.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Asia (7.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Scottish (7.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Poland (7.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |