Maltese vs Latvian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Maltese
Latvian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Maltese
Latvians
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Latvian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,303,911 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,290,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 0.55%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Latvian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 18.6% | 26.1% |
| Range | 17.5% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 6.7% |
| Median | 5.7% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Latvians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 0.44%), Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |