Filipino vs Latvian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
Latvian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Latvians
6.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Latvian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,803,740 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,290,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 6.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Latvian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 12.3% | 26.1% |
| Range | 10.4% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 6.7% |
| Median | 5.3% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Latvians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Thai (6.7%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 0.61%), Chinese (6.5%, a difference of 2.2%), Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 0.44%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |