Carpatho Rusyn vs Turkish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Turkish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Turks
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Turkish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,816,515 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014 and weighted average of 7.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,236,955 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 7.5%, a difference of 0.47%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.31% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 16.9% | 18.7% |
| Range | 16.6% | 16.3% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 7.1% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Turks by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Australia (7.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Greek (7.5%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Greek (7.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.41%), Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |