Luxembourger vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Turks
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,279,235 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,078,703 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 66.7% |
| Range | 48.7% | 66.3% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 13.5% |
| Median | 10.7% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Turks by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Russian (13.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Australia (13.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |