Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Turkish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Turkish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Turks
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Turkish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,025,257 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,236,955 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 7.5%, a difference of 4.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 18.7% |
| Range | 15.2% | 16.3% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 7.1% |
| Median | 5.2% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Turks by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Greek (7.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.75%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.98%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and Czech (7.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |