Bulgarian vs Lithuanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Lithuanian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bulgarians
Lithuanians
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Lithuanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,945,490 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 410,552,780 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 5.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 0.87% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 46.7% | 78.0% |
Range | 45.8% | 77.7% |
Mean | 12.7% | 19.1% |
Median | 11.4% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 21.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 17.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 17.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Lithuanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Russian (13.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and Danish (13.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |