Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Netherlands Receiving Food Stamps

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,526,649 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 9.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,448,822 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 4.3%.

Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary

Measurement	Luxembourger	Immigrants from Netherlands
Minimum	0.57%	0.90%
Maximum	13.6%	33.6%
Range	13.1%	32.7%
Mean	6.0%	9.4%
Median	6.2%	7.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.5%	5.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.2%	11.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.7%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.9%	6.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.9%	6.8%

Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Immigrants from Netherlands by Receiving Food Stamps

In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (9.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Australia (9.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Netherlands are Immigrants from Bolivia (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.020%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.39%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Receiving Food Stamps
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 9.1%
Luxembourgers	99.8 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 9.1%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.8 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 9.2%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 9.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.8 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 9.2%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 9.2%
Swedes	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 9.2%
Bhutanese	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 9.2%
Czechs	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 9.2%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 9.2%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 9.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 9.3%
Bolivians	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 9.3%
Zimbabweans	99.6 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 9.5%
Turks	99.6 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Austria	99.6 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 9.5%
Estonians	99.6 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 9.5%
Europeans	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.5 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.5 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.5 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 9.5%