Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Czech
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Czechs
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
74.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
46.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,448,754 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,282,128 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Czech |
| Minimum | 5.6% | 6.8% |
| Maximum | 62.5% | 80.9% |
| Range | 56.9% | 74.1% |
| Mean | 27.0% | 29.6% |
| Median | 21.6% | 25.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.3% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.4% | 36.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.1% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 14.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Czechs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |