Jordanian vs Immigrants from England Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Immigrants from England
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Immigrants from England
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Immigrants from England Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,392,189 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,675,853 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 0.18%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Immigrants from England |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 39.7% | 72.8% |
| Range | 36.8% | 70.1% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 16.7% |
| Median | 10.9% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 13.8% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from England by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Irish (12.4%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |