Aleut vs Immigrants from England Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Immigrants from England
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Immigrants from England
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Immigrants from England Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,771,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,675,853 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 8.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Immigrants from England |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 72.8% |
| Range | 48.7% | 70.1% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 16.7% |
| Median | 12.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 13.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |