Japanese vs Immigrants from Panama Family Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from Panama
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from Panama
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from Panama Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,852,848 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,994,048 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from Panama |
Minimum | 0.66% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 45.9% | 19.8% |
Range | 45.3% | 17.9% |
Mean | 14.7% | 9.7% |
Median | 11.0% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from Panama by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |