Jamaican vs Polish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Polish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Poles
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Polish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,369,042 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 8.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Polish |
Minimum | 4.4% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 77.8% |
Range | 45.6% | 72.7% |
Mean | 20.9% | 19.6% |
Median | 21.2% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 21.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 9.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Icelander (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Panama (21.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |