Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Polish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Polish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Poles
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Polish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,836,819 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.080%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Polish |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 48.1% | 77.8% |
| Range | 37.7% | 72.7% |
| Mean | 21.8% | 19.6% |
| Median | 19.5% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan and Poles by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |