Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Polish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Polish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Poles
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Polish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,624,577 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.050%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Polish |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 56.0% | 77.8% |
| Range | 52.6% | 72.7% |
| Mean | 23.2% | 19.6% |
| Median | 20.9% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.9% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.1% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Poles by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |