Cherokee vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,113,161 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,249,707 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 3.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 81.8% |
| Range | 47.1% | 80.8% |
| Mean | 15.7% | 11.1% |
| Median | 13.3% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.87%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |