Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,127,815 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,336,049 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 3.5%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago	Cherokee
Minimum	1.5%	5.3%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	98.5%	94.7%
Mean	19.2%	30.7%
Median	17.8%	26.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.9%	21.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.5%	34.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.6%	13.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.2%	16.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.1%	16.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Cherokee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Cape Verdean (19.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Spanish American Indian (19.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.79%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Cape Verdeans	0.3 /100 \| #250	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.3 /100 \| #253	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.9%