Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Pakistan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Pakistan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Pakistan
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Pakistan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,739,253 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,475,243 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Pakistan |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 15.6% | 21.0% |
| Range | 13.8% | 19.6% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 7.8% |
| Median | 6.5% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Pakistan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Romanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Jordanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |