Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Jordanian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Jordanian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Jordanians
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Jordanian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,739,253 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,331,422 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 0.52%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Jordanian |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 15.6% | 38.9% |
Range | 13.8% | 38.1% |
Mean | 7.1% | 8.7% |
Median | 6.5% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 10.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Jordanians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Basque (8.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Romanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.15%), French Canadian (8.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Egyptian (8.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |