Immigrants from South Africa vs Immigrants from England Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Immigrants from England
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Immigrants from England
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Immigrants from England Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,179,579 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.815 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,609,977 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.78%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Immigrants from England |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 57.1% |
Range | 73.9% | 55.9% |
Mean | 11.9% | 13.0% |
Median | 8.1% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from England by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Jordanian (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Czechoslovakian (10.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Northern European (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Egyptian (10.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |