Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Japanese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Japanese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Japanese
13.3%
POVERTY
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
POVERTY
3.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Japanese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,719,831 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,091,915 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.597 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 0.040%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Japanese |
Minimum | 0.14% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 31.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 30.9% | 96.9% |
Mean | 12.2% | 18.8% |
Median | 10.9% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 21.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 14.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Japanese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.19%), American (13.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and Bermudan (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Bermudan (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and American (13.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.4% |
German Russians | 2.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.4% |
Marshallese | 2.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.4% |