Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Malaysian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Malaysian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Malaysians
13.3%
POVERTY
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
POVERTY
6.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Malaysian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,719,831 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,011,043 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.5%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Malaysian |
Minimum | 0.14% | 0.56% |
Maximum | 31.1% | 34.7% |
Range | 30.9% | 34.2% |
Mean | 12.2% | 13.8% |
Median | 10.9% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Malaysians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and American (13.4%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from the Azores (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Moroccan (13.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Hmong | 15.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |