Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Alaskan Athabascans
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,471,628 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.495 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,790,128 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.79%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 0.57% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 16.7% | 76.9% |
Range | 16.1% | 74.9% |
Mean | 8.8% | 18.8% |
Median | 9.8% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 25.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 18.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |