Nepalese vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Nepalese
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Nepalese
Alaskan Athabascans
10.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,521,755 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,790,128 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 3.5%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d325/8d325d6b4ccd2125a883f077259a3d6e5caa1cfc" alt="Nepalese vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Poverty"
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nepalese | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 0.90% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 28.9% | 76.9% |
Range | 28.0% | 74.9% |
Mean | 11.8% | 18.8% |
Median | 9.7% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 25.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 18.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Nepalese and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Cree (10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |