Immigrants from Oceania vs Slavic Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Slavic
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Slavs
16.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
67.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Slavic Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 294,567,604 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,045,487 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.43%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Slavic |
Minimum | 2.4% | 7.2% |
Maximum | 53.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 51.2% | 92.8% |
Mean | 21.6% | 33.6% |
Median | 18.0% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 40.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 23.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 24.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 24.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Slavs by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Colombia (16.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Costa Rican (16.9%, a difference of 0.27%), English (16.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Irish (16.8%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Uruguayan (17.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from South America (17.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (17.1%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
South Americans | 75.1 /100 | #155 | Good 16.7% |
Afghans | 74.4 /100 | #156 | Good 16.8% |
Venezuelans | 73.7 /100 | #157 | Good 16.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 72.5 /100 | #158 | Good 16.8% |
Immigrants | Syria | 72.3 /100 | #159 | Good 16.8% |
Irish | 72.0 /100 | #160 | Good 16.8% |
English | 70.4 /100 | #161 | Good 16.8% |
Costa Ricans | 69.8 /100 | #162 | Good 16.9% |
Scottish | 68.6 /100 | #163 | Good 16.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 67.6 /100 | #164 | Good 16.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 66.9 /100 | #165 | Good 16.9% |
Slavs | 64.0 /100 | #166 | Good 17.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 62.0 /100 | #167 | Good 17.0% |
Uruguayans | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 60.0 /100 | #169 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 59.2 /100 | #170 | Average 17.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 58.9 /100 | #171 | Average 17.1% |
Yugoslavians | 54.1 /100 | #172 | Average 17.2% |
Welsh | 54.0 /100 | #173 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 17.3% |