Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Liberian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Liberian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Liberians
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Liberian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,310,787 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,038,056 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 2.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Liberian |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 56.3% | 45.5% |
| Range | 55.7% | 43.6% |
| Mean | 16.6% | 15.7% |
| Median | 14.9% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua and Liberians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |