Immigrants from Cuba vs British Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
British
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
British
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
35.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
189th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs British Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,497,975 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.281 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,545,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 0.50%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | British |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 17.3% |
| Maximum | 43.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 40.7% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 21.1% | 44.7% |
| Median | 20.7% | 34.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 70.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 48.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 29.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 29.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and British by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (21.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.030%), European (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |