Immigrants from Colombia vs Uruguayan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Colombia
Uruguayan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Colombia
Uruguayans
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Colombia vs Uruguayan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 373,438,404 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Colombia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,837,387 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Colombia | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 3.5% | 9.0% |
Maximum | 39.4% | 83.3% |
Range | 35.8% | 74.3% |
Mean | 19.4% | 32.4% |
Median | 19.4% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.4% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 53.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 36.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 24.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Colombia and Uruguayans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Colombia are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |