Immigrants from Spain vs Uruguayan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
Uruguayan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Uruguayans
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Spain vs Uruguayan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,218,477 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,837,387 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 0.16%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Spain | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 11.2% | 9.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 83.3% |
Range | 88.8% | 74.3% |
Mean | 30.0% | 32.4% |
Median | 20.6% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.9% | 53.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.0% | 36.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.8% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 24.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Spain and Uruguayans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |