Immigrants from Belarus vs Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Lumbee
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Lumbee
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,734,264 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,627 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 30.7%, a difference of 107.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Lumbee |
Minimum | 2.0% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 43.9% | 78.3% |
Range | 41.9% | 68.3% |
Mean | 14.5% | 38.6% |
Median | 13.7% | 35.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 51.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 26.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 16.0% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 0.78%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.1%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |