Laotian vs Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Laotian
Lumbee
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Laotians
Lumbee
14.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,726,350 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,627 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 30.7%, a difference of 111.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 35.0% | 78.3% |
| Range | 32.7% | 68.3% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 38.6% |
| Median | 14.2% | 35.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 51.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 26.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 16.0% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Argentina (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Belgium (14.5%, a difference of 0.41%), European (14.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 0.78%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.1%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |