Yuman vs Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Yuman
Lumbee
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Yuman
Lumbee
27.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,600,954 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 27.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,627 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 30.7%, a difference of 13.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yuman | Lumbee |
Minimum | 15.3% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 78.3% |
Range | 84.7% | 68.3% |
Mean | 39.6% | 38.6% |
Median | 31.3% | 35.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.5% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.0% | 51.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.5% | 26.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.2% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.4% | 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Crow (26.4%, a difference of 2.7%), Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 2.9%), Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 3.1%), Pima (28.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 0.78%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.1%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |