Immigrants from Australia vs Macedonian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Macedonian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Macedonians
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Macedonian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,116,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,594,768 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.353 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 2.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Macedonian |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 48.6% | 22.4% |
| Range | 47.6% | 21.7% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 9.2% |
| Median | 10.3% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Macedonians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (12.1%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |