Immigrants from Armenia vs Spanish American Indian Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,477,014 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,069,372 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 0.68%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Armenia	Spanish American Indian
Minimum	1.8%	3.0%
Maximum	14.8%	21.3%
Range	13.1%	18.4%
Mean	6.4%	7.4%
Median	5.9%	6.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.1%	5.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.3%	8.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.2%	3.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.1%	4.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.1%	4.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Armenia and Spanish American Indians by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Armenia are Immigrants from Dominica (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Hopi (7.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (7.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and British West Indian (7.1%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Guatemalan (7.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Hopi (7.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.1%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Dominica (7.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (7.1%, a difference of 0.79%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 6.7%
Central Americans	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 6.7%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 6.7%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.0 /100 \| #303	Tragic 6.8%
Cubans	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 6.8%
Haitians	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 6.8%
Immigrants \| Haiti	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 7.0%
Guatemalans	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 7.0%
Spanish American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 7.1%
Hopi	0.0 /100 \| #309	Tragic 7.1%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic 7.1%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 7.1%
Immigrants \| Armenia	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 7.1%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 7.1%
British West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 7.1%
Inupiat	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 7.1%
Hondurans	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 7.2%
Mexicans	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 7.2%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 7.2%
Immigrants \| Latin America	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 7.2%
Immigrants \| Grenada	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 7.3%