Filipino vs Creek Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Filipino
Creek
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Filipinos
Creek
11.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Creek Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,988,571 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,656,713 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 93.8%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Creek |
Minimum | 0.83% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 19.0% | 75.0% |
Range | 18.1% | 70.8% |
Mean | 7.9% | 28.7% |
Median | 7.5% | 25.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 35.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (11.0%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from India (10.9%, a difference of 2.3%), Thai (11.7%, a difference of 5.1%), Chinese (11.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 10.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Ute (21.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |