Moroccan vs Creek Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Moroccan
Creek
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Moroccans
Creek
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
5.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Creek Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,157,995 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,656,713 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 21.5%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Moroccan | Creek |
Minimum | 4.6% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 75.0% |
Range | 62.1% | 70.8% |
Mean | 23.3% | 28.7% |
Median | 17.9% | 25.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 35.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Japanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (17.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Osage (17.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Sierra Leonean (17.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Panamanian (17.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Alaskan Athabascans | 7.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 6.8 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 6.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
Japanese | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.7% |
Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 3.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Ute (21.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |