Jordanian vs Creek Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Jordanian
Creek
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Jordanians
Creek
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Creek Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,479,889 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,656,713 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 42.8%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Creek |
Minimum | 1.9% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 43.3% | 75.0% |
Range | 41.4% | 70.8% |
Mean | 16.0% | 28.7% |
Median | 13.0% | 25.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 35.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Pakistani (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Dutch (15.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (15.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Chileans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Dutch | 95.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Ute (21.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |