Dominican vs Guamanian/Chamorro Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Dominican
Guamanian/Chamorro
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Dominicans
Guamanians/Chamorros
23.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
75.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dominican vs Guamanian/Chamorro Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,076,345 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 23.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,387,643 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 48.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dominican | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Minimum | 6.6% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 52.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 45.9% | 98.0% |
Mean | 27.0% | 23.8% |
Median | 26.2% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.6% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.2% | 24.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 23.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Dominicans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Kiowa (23.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (23.8%, a difference of 0.65%), Apache (23.8%, a difference of 0.70%), Native/Alaskan (24.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and Central American Indian (22.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |