Danish vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Danish
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Danes
Immigrants from Hong Kong
9.0%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,155,016 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,389,462 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223 and weighted average of 9.1%, a difference of 0.58%.

Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 17.7% | 20.6% |
Range | 16.3% | 20.1% |
Mean | 7.9% | 7.4% |
Median | 7.4% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Scotland (9.0%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Japan (9.0%, a difference of 0.61%), Norwegian (9.0%, a difference of 0.88%), Latvian (9.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and Luxembourger (9.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Latvian (9.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Luxembourger (9.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Australia (9.2%, a difference of 0.73%), Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |