Cuban vs Ukrainian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Ukrainian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Ukrainians
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
79.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
80.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Ukrainian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,594,477 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 384,483,508 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.070%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Ukrainian |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 6.0% |
| Maximum | 35.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.4% | 94.0% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 37.9% |
| Median | 11.4% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 57.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 45.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 34.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 33.6% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Ukrainians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Austria (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (12.5%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Austria (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Ecuadorians | 85.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 85.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 84.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 83.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Salvadorans | 83.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
| Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
| Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |