Creek vs Immigrants from Oceania Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,068,502 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 35.0%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Creek	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	5.1%	4.3%
Maximum	77.8%	39.0%
Range	72.7%	34.8%
Mean	31.3%	19.3%
Median	28.4%	18.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	19.7%	14.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	40.3%	21.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	20.7%	7.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.8%	8.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.7%	7.9%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 21.4%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 21.4%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 21.5%
Bahamians	0.0 /100 \| #309	Tragic 21.5%
Immigrants \| Somalia	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic 21.6%
Dutch West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 21.6%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 21.6%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 21.7%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 21.7%
Ute	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 21.8%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 21.9%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 21.9%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 22.1%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 22.1%
Hondurans	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 22.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Germany (16.1%, a difference of 0.14%), South American (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.48%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Fiji	76.1 /100 \| #156	Good 15.9%
Colombians	76.1 /100 \| #157	Good 15.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 15.9%
Slovaks	75.2 /100 \| #159	Good 15.9%
French	72.8 /100 \| #160	Good 16.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	72.0 /100 \| #161	Good 16.0%
French Canadians	68.7 /100 \| #162	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	68.4 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Colombia	67.8 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	67.3 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
South Americans	67.2 /100 \| #166	Good 16.1%
Uruguayans	64.7 /100 \| #167	Good 16.2%
Yugoslavians	64.4 /100 \| #168	Good 16.2%
Costa Ricans	64.2 /100 \| #169	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	64.2 /100 \| #170	Good 16.2%